Wow Earn / Token

HackenFiles named in the report

Hacken reviewed Wow Earn (Wow Earn / Token) on 29 Dec 2023: 22 findings, 0 critical; 10 marked fixed, 12 open.

No open critical findings
Open Wow Earn’s security record

The original report was removed from its address (seen 17 Oct 2026).

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings22

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High000
Medium000
Low12010
LowCustom Errors in Solidity for Gas EfficiencyOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowGas overconsumption in deposit mechanismOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowLack of days time unit usage across solutionOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowMisleading error messagesOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing input validation for key parametersOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowNative tokens transfer via the transfer() functionOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowRedundant condition within the register() functionOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowThe amount() function can return inaccurate valueOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowThe getCurrentTime() is redundant wrapperOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowThe getLockTime() is redundant getterOpen

The report gives no description here.

Show 2 more
LowThe totalCumulative state variable can be calculated only onceOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowUnused eventsOpen

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Repository and files the report names (1)

  • mineWOW.sol

Part of Wow Earn’s security record

Wow Earn
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Dec 2023, by Hacken.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Wow Earn’s security record

Security firm

Hacken

343 projects reviewed · 476 reports · latest Sep 2026

See Hacken’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us