C8ntinuum / Contracts-Sol
Hacken reviewed C8ntinuum (C8ntinuum / Contracts-Sol) on 3 Apr 2025: 8 findings, 1 critical; 3 marked fixed, 5 open.
1 critical finding, fixed
Open the reportOpen C8ntinuum’s security record
Report hosted on hacken.io.
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings8
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 5 | 0 | 2 |
LowInefficient Blacklist DesignOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowMissing Nonce Allows Repeated Executions of the Same Signed Generation RequestOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowNo Mechanism to Remove Addresses from BlacklistOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowReferral SOL Transfers May Fail if Recipients Are Not Rent-ExemptOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowWSOL Price Derived Solely from Raydium Pool May Be ManipulableOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0xc8ef4398664b2eed5ee560544f659083d98a3888 | Chain: Ethereum | Source code: Verified source |
Part of C8ntinuum’s security record
C8ntinuumAudits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Apr 2025, by Hacken.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn that report, 1 critical finding was reported. It is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.
Open C8ntinuum’s security recordSecurity firm
Hacken343 projects reviewed · 476 reports · latest Sep 2026
See Hacken’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us