Duneswap audit
Audit · firm’s term: smart contract audit
PeckShield reviewed Duneswap (Duneswap audit) on 26 Feb 2022: 6 findings, 0 critical; 2 marked fixed, 4 acknowledged.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Duneswap’s security record
Report hosted on GitHub.
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings6
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Medium | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Low | 0 | 3 | 1 |
MediumTrust Issue of Admin KeysAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowAccommodation of Non-ERC20-Compliant TokensAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowDuplicate Pool Detection And PreventionAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowFork-Resistant Domain Separator In DuneERC20Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Part of Duneswap’s security record
DuneswapAudits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Feb 2022, by PeckShield.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Duneswap’s security recordSecurity firm
PeckShield181 projects reviewed · 247 reports · latest Apr 2026
See PeckShield’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us