CertiK reviewed Vestate (VESTATE (VES)) on 17 May 2024: 3 findings, 0 critical; 1 acknowledged, 2 open.
Report hosted on skynet.certik.com.
Trustblock does not review code.
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 0 | 1 | 0 |
In the contract `VES` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority and change the addresses of `marketingWallet` and `uniswapV2Pair`, exclude accounts from fees, and set buy or sell fees of up to 10%. 
All of the VES tokens are sent to the contract deployer. This is a centralization risk because the deployer can distribute tokens without obtaining the consensus of the community. Any compromise to these addresses may allow a hacker to steal and sell tokens on the market, resulting in severe damage to the project.
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x1f55…55190x1f557fb2aa33dce484902695ca1374f413875519 | Chain: Ethereum | Source code: Verified source |
1,044 projects reviewed · 1,375 reports · latest May 2025
See CertiK’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us