zkSync Fee Model and Token Bridge Audit
Audit · firm’s term: audit
Part of OpenZeppelin’s series
OpenZeppelin reviewed ZKsync (zkSync Fee Model and Token Bridge Audit) on 9 Mar 2023: 14 findings, 0 critical; 10 marked fixed, 2 acknowledged, 2 open.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen ZKsync’s security record
Report hosted on blog.openzeppelin.com.
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings14
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Medium | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Low | 1 | 0 | 7 |
MediumLack of __gap VariableAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
MediumUsers Can Lose Funds in L1ERC20Bridge Implementation ContractAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Repository and files the report names (20)
- IContractDeployer.sol
- AccountCodeStorage.sol
- L2EthToken.sol
- IKnownCodesStorage.sol
- IImmutableSimulator.sol
- bootloader.yul
- L2StandardERC20.sol
- NonceHolder.sol
- L2ERC20Bridge.sol
- IEthToken.sol
- IL1Bridge.sol
- IL2StandardToken.sol
- INonceHolder.sol
- MsgValueSimulator.sol
- IL2Bridge.sol
- L1ERC20Bridge.sol
- KnownCodesStorage.sol
- IAccountCodeStorage.sol
- ContractDeployer.sol
- ImmutableSimulator.sol
Part of ZKsync’s security record
ZKsyncAudits18 audits by 1 firmLast audit Feb 2025, by OpenZeppelin.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross the 18 reports, 2 critical findings were reported. Each is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.
Open ZKsync’s security recordSecurity firm
OpenZeppelin67 projects reviewed · 184 reports · latest Aug 2026
See OpenZeppelin’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us