TitanTrading

CertiKFiles named in the report

CertiK reviewed Titan Trading (TitanTrading) on 18 Apr 2023: 3 findings, 0 critical; all marked fixed.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Titan Trading’s security record

Report hosted on skynet.certik.com.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings3

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High001
Medium001
Low001
HighInitial Token DistributionFixed

Tokens are sent to `_msgSender()` when deploying the contract. This could be a centralization risk as the `_msgSender()` can distribute tokens without obtaining the consensus of the community.

MediumNo Upper Limit in `setBuyFeeRate()` functionFixed

There are no upper boundaries for `_buyFeeForRate` which is used to set the buy fee rate. It is possible to set the total fee rate up to any arbitrary amount. The lack of an upper bound check on the fee parameter could potentially allow setting an excessively high fee rate, which could cause problems for other parts of the system that rely on this value.

LowVariable That Could Be Declared as ImmutableFixed

The `maxSupply` variable assigned in the constructor can be declared as `immutable`. Immutable state variable can be assigned during contract creation but will remain constant throughout the lifetime of a deployed contract. A big advantage of immutable variable is that reading them is significantly cheaper than reading from regular state variable since they will not be stored in storage.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Repository and files the report names (1)

  • contracts/TESToken.sol

Part of Titan Trading’s security record

Titan Trading
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Apr 2023, by CertiK.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Titan Trading’s security record

Security firm

CertiK

1,044 projects reviewed · 1,375 reports · latest May 2025

See CertiK’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us