CertiK reviewed Halo (Halo Wallet) on 5 Dec 2024: 3 findings, 0 critical; all acknowledged, none fixed.
Report hosted on skynet.certik.com.
Trustblock does not review code.
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 0 | 0 | 0 |
In the contract `HaloToken`, the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority and do the following things: - `mint()`, mint tokens to specified addresses - `transferOwnership()`, transfer ownership - `renounceOwnership()`, give up ownership  In the contract `HaloToken`, the role `_pendingOwner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_pendingOwner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority and do the following things: - `acceptOwnership()`, get the ownership
In the contract `HaloToken`, the role `owner` has the authority to update the token balance of an arbitrary account without sanity restriction. Any compromise to the `owner` account may allow a hacker to take advantage of this authority and manipulate users' balances. For example, the attacker could also update his/her balance to a large number, sell these tokens, and cause the token price to drop.
All of the `2_100_000_000e18` tokens are sent to the contract deployer or one or several externally-owned account (EOA) addresses. This is a centralization risk because the deployer or the owner(s) of the EOAs can distribute tokens without obtaining the consensus of the community. Any compromise to these addresses may allow a hacker to steal and sell tokens on the market, resulting in severe damage to the project.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Repository and files the report names (1)
1,044 projects reviewed · 1,375 reports · latest May 2025
See CertiK’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us