Super Squid Game
Audit · firm’s term: audit report
Cyberscope reviewed Super Squid Game on 8 Jul 2022: 5 findings, 1 critical; none marked fixed.
1 open critical finding
Open the reportOpen Super Squid Game’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash bafkreietobxwcn4gum2udad7y6ciylj56sk563ei7iinkmyirq5wzub7ca
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings5
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 4 | 0 | 0 |
CriticalELFM - Exceed Limit Fees ManipulationOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL01 - Public Function could be Declared ExternalOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL04 - Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL09 - Dead Code EliminationOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL13 - Divide before Multiply OperationOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0xd462aed2d7477ffc70c0cbc136ee410f5bbd09c6 | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of Super Squid Game’s security record
Super Squid Game
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Jul 2022, by Cyberscope.
Critical findings1 open critical findingReported in “Super Squid Game” by Cyberscope, Jul 2022. Not marked fixed in that report.
Open Super Squid Game’s security recordSecurity firm
Cyberscope1,784 projects reviewed · 2,060 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Cyberscope’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us