Grand Gangsta City / Token

HackenFiles named in the report

Hacken reviewed Grand Gangsta City (Grand Gangsta City / Token) on 10 Jul 2025: 12 findings, 0 critical; 9 marked fixed, 3 acknowledged.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Grand Gangsta City’s security record

Report hosted on hacken.io.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings12

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High001
Medium000
Low038
HighIncorrect SECONDS_PER_MONTH Constant Used in Vesting CalculationsFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowFloating PragmaFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowInconsistent Revert Style in GGC Contract: require vs. revertFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowInconsistent TGE Percent HandlingFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowRedundant EventFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowRedundant totalVestingSeconds Check in allocateBatch() FunctionFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowRisk of Ownership Control Loss in Owner-Dependent ContractFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowUnnecessary Explicit Initialization of uint256 Variables to ZeroFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowUnnecessary nonReentrant Modifier in Claim FunctionFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Repository and files the report names (4)

  • GGC.sol
  • GGC_Hardhat_Setup/artifacts/contracts/GGC.sol/GGC.json
  • GGC_Hardhat_Setup/contracts/GGC.sol
  • GGC_Hardhat_Setup/artifacts/contracts/GGC.sol/GGC.dbg.json

Part of Grand Gangsta City’s security record

Grand Gangsta City
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Jul 2025, by Hacken.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Grand Gangsta City’s security record

Security firm

Hacken

343 projects reviewed · 476 reports · latest Sep 2026

See Hacken’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us