Acecoin / AMG AceToken

HackenFiles named in the report

Hacken reviewed Acecoin (Acecoin / AMG AceToken) on 27 Jan 2026: 36 findings, 0 critical; 30 marked fixed, 6 acknowledged.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Acecoin’s security record

Report hosted on hacken.io.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings36

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High002
Medium058
Low0120
HighStaking Capacity Permanently Lost as Stakes CompleteFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighTeam Rewards Accumulate Without Required Active StakeFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumIncorrect Assumption of USDT Decimals Leads to Fee MiscalculationsFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumIncorrect Referral Traversal in _addDownlines() Skips Intermediate UplinesFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumMismatch Between Tier Assignment and Enumeration Breaks Tier DeterminismFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumMissing State Validation Enables Re-Subscription to An Active LevelFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumSubscription Renewal Resets Timer Instead of Extending Causing User Fund LossFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumTestnet Time Constants Used in Production CodeFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumUnimplemented pendingReward State Variable Results in Dead Code and Potential Reward Accounting IssuesFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumUnstake() Function Behaves Differently Than Documented System RequirementFixed

The report gives no description here.

Show 10 more
Low`getSubscribedLevels()` Returns Expired Levels as ActiveFixed

The report gives no description here.

Low`getUserCount()` Returns Misleading ValueFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowConfusing Error Handling When User Has No Active StakesFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowCustom Ownership Implementation Causes Weaker Access Control GuaranteesFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowDuplicate lastStakeAmount Assignment in stake()Fixed

The report gives no description here.

LowFloating PragmaFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowIncorrect Boundary Condition Activates Protection System Despite Sufficient Contract BalanceFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowLack of Public Access to Critical Protocol DataFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing Maximum Fee Cap in setCustomFee() Allows Arbitrary Fee AssignmentFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing Minimum Fee Validation in `setDefaultFee()`Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Show 10 more
LowMissing SafeERC20 For Not ERC20 Compliant USDTFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing Zero-Value Validation for directReward Can Trigger Redundant TransfersFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowPotential Loss of Ownership Control in Contract Using OwnableFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowPrecision Loss in Penalty Calculation Allows Penalty-Free Stake And Unstake for Small AmountsFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowPublic Functions Not Used Internally Can Lead To Additional Gas CostsFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowRedundant Utility Functions Introduce Dead CodeFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowRedundant Zero-Validation of Pre-Initialized lastClaimTime Wastes Gas Across Reward FunctionsFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowStale userStakeTierCount After Unstake Breaks Tier Accounting InvariantsFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowUnused State Variables Introduce Security RisksFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowUse Of Custom Errors Instead Of Revert StringsFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Repository and files the report names (4)

  • MemoryManager.sol
  • AceCoin.sol
  • StakingAndRewards.sol
  • Subscription.sol

Part of Acecoin’s security record

Acecoin
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Jan 2026, by Hacken.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Acecoin’s security record

Security firm

Hacken

343 projects reviewed · 476 reports · latest Sep 2026

See Hacken’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us