Goledo audit

PeckShield12 Oct 2022Code version: not recorded (see the report)

PeckShield reviewed Goledo (Goledo audit) on 12 Oct 2022: 5 findings, 0 critical; all acknowledged, none fixed.

No open critical findings

Open the report Open Goledo’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings5

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

Severity	Open	Acknowledged	Fixed
Critical	0	0	0
High	0	0	0
Medium	0	3	0
Low	0	2	0

MediumIncentive Inconsistency Between AToken And StableDebtTokenAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

MediumRevisited Reentrancy Protection In Current ImplementationAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

MediumTrust Issue Of Admin KeysAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowFork-Compliant Domain Separator In ATokenAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowIncompatibility With Deflationary/Rebasing TokensAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Goledo’s security record

Goledo

Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Oct 2022, by PeckShield.

Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.

Open Goledo’s security record

Security firm

PeckShield

181 projects reviewed · 247 reports · latest Apr 2026

See PeckShield’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.