Sei Cosmos audit

Oak SecurityCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Audit · firm’s term: security audit

Oak Security reviewed Sei (Sei Cosmos audit) on 15 May 2023: 4 findings, 1 critical; all marked fixed.

1 critical finding, fixed
Open the reportOpen Sei’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings4

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical001
High002
Medium000
Low001

Marked Informational by the firm. Not counted as findings.

InformationalDead code in encryptPrivKeyFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalMintCoins does not perform a nil pointer validation in case the module name is passed incorrectlyFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalMiscellaneous commentsFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalMissing usage description for transaction and query CLI commandsFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalResolve TODOs before releaseFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalUnnecessary lock acquisition might negatively impact performanceFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalUnused assignment in GetSignersFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalUse of deprecated functionFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Sei’s security record

Sei
Audits2 audits by 1 firmLast audit May 2023, by Oak Security.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross the 2 reports, 2 critical findings were reported. Each is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.
Open Sei’s security record

Security firm

Oak Security

33 projects reviewed · 59 reports · latest May 2026

See Oak Security’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us