Oracle Contracts

Halborn29 Jan 2026Code version: not recorded (see the report)

Halborn reviewed Chiliz (Oracle Contracts) on 29 Jan 2026: 8 findings, 0 critical; all marked fixed.

No open critical findings

Open the report Open Chiliz’s security record

Report hosted on halborn.com.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings8

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

Severity	Open	Acknowledged	Fixed
Critical	0	0	0
High	0	0	0
Medium	0	0	1
Low	0	0	7

MediumIncomplete upgrade mechanismFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowCompatibility mismatch between claimed Chainlink behavior and revert read behaviorFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowFixed timestamp age does not reflect asset volatilityFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowIncompatible reentrancy guard choice in upgradeable designFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowInconsistent price validation across update functionsFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing factory setters for oracle configurationFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowNo storage gap defined for future upgradesFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowRound start timestamp is derived from previous round rather than explicit round startFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Chiliz’s security record

Chiliz

Audits8 audits by 3 firmsLast audit Jan 2026, by Halborn.

Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross the 8 reports, 1 critical finding was reported. It is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.

Open Chiliz’s security record

Security firm

Halborn

17 projects reviewed · 44 reports · latest Jul 2026

See Halborn’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.