CertiK reviewed STFX on 12 Dec 2022: 16 findings, 0 critical; 3 marked fixed, 13 acknowledged.
Report hosted on skynet.certik.com.
Trustblock does not review code.
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Low | 0 | 11 | 3 |
The comment of the function `depositIntoFund()` says that amount has to be between `minInvestmentAmount` and `maxInvestmentAmount`. But the implementation seems not to align with the design. As per the implementation, `minInvestmentAmount` represents for the lower limit of one investment. However, `maxInvestmentAmount` represents the upper limit of the total investments.
We understand that the protocol needs to publicize the manager's investment strategy at the beginning of the creation, which is beneficial to gain the trust of users. While the users can copy the strategy from the events and open positions themselves to avoid fees, which might be unfair to those experienced managers.
The managers have to raise money before opening the position. But if they raised no money or a little, it might be a waste of gas to open a position or create the `stf` contract. So it might be better to create the `stf` contract when the manager is really about to invest.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Repository and files the report names (7)
1,044 projects reviewed · 1,393 reports · latest May 2025
See CertiK’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us