Radiant security review
Pashov Audit Group reviewed Radiant (Radiant security review) on 6 Jul 2024: 18 findings, 1 critical; 14 marked fixed, 4 acknowledged.
Report hosted on GitHub.
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings18
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Medium | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Low | 0 | 2 | 4 |
CriticalNo approvals from Helper to TokenizedLPFixed
The report gives no description here.
HighGriefing attack via continuous deposit and withdrawalFixed
The report gives no description here.
HighUniV3TokenizedLp can be attacked by an initial donationFixed
The report gives no description here.
Highwithdraw() does not take into account the pending feeFixed
The report gives no description here.
MediumAttacker can exploit oracle price differences to arbitrageFixed
The report gives no description here.
MediumBypassable checkLastBlockAction ModifierFixed
The report gives no description here.
MediumDepositing UniV3PoolHelper only once per block for all usersFixed
The report gives no description here.
MediumLack of slippage check in rebalance FunctionFixed
The report gives no description here.
Mediumrebalance uses the wrong balanceFixed
The report gives no description here.
MediumThe pending fee should be settled before adjusting the feeFixed
The report gives no description here.
Show 4 more
LowgetTotalAmounts and getBasePosition may be DOSedFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowMissing oracle decimal normalizationFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowNo pending income in functionsFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowNot used approvalsFixed
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Part of Radiant’s security record
RadiantSecurity firm
Pashov Audit Group30 projects reviewed · 53 reports · latest Jul 2026
See Pashov Audit Group’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us