Orderly Network audit

SherlockCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Audit competition · firm’s term: private contest

Sherlock reviewed Orderly Network (Orderly Network audit) on 30 Jun 2024: 5 findings, 0 critical; 4 marked fixed, 1 acknowledged.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Orderly Network’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings5

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High001
Medium013
Low000
HighValor._doValorEmission() should not be a public functionFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumBackward fees are not sent to the ledger and there is no function to extract them from vault chainFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumMismatch between lastValorUpdateTimestamp and valorEmissionStartTimestamp during the OmnichainLedgerV1.initialize() functionFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumProxyLedger operations will always revert due to mismatch of fee in the parameter and ProxyLedger provided to _lzSend()Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Orderly Network’s security record

Orderly Network
Audits19 audits by 5 firmsLast audit Nov 2025, by Guardian Audits.
Critical findings2 criticals acknowledged, not fixedReported in 2 reports, the latest by Guardian Audits, Oct 2023. The team acknowledged both.
Open Orderly Network’s security record

Security firm

Sherlock

46 projects reviewed · 67 reports · latest Sep 2026

See Sherlock’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us