ASKJA
Audit · firm’s term: audit report
Cyberscope reviewed ASKJA on 9 May 2022: 2 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen ASKJA’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash bafkreieqviqohzozjawhwmk7t6vdjogcz5dmtqjwqwhgrxl7c3ogg7exdi
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings2
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 2 | 0 | 0 |
LowL01 - Public Function could be Declared ExternalOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL04 - Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x615b0893134cb59889dd8fba0abe38a84570c083 | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of ASKJA’s security record
ASKJA
Audits2 audits by 1 firmLast audit May 2022, by Cyberscope.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 2 reports.
Open ASKJA’s security recordSecurity firm
Cyberscope1,784 projects reviewed · 2,059 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Cyberscope’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us