Securitize DSToken Compliance Diff Audit Report

CyfrinCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Cyfrin reviewed Securitize (Securitize DSToken Compliance Diff Audit Report) on 4 Jun 2026: 5 findings, 0 critical; 4 marked fixed, 1 acknowledged.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Securitize’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings5

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High000
Medium003
Low011
MediumComplianceServicePermissionless::_lockedAt and ComplianceServicePermissionless::_cleanupIssuances perform unguarded timestamp + lockPeriod addition, allowing a transfer agent to freeze transfers and iFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumComplianceServicePermissionless::recordIssuance writes a lockup record even when the lock period is zero, causing tokens minted with no lockup to be retroactively locked when a lockup is later enabledFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumTokenLibrary::issueTokensCustom routes every manual lock under permissionless into a single shared investorsLocks[""] bucket, exhausting the global 30-lock cap and DoS-ing all future issuances with maFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowWalletManager::setSpecialWallet guard is inert under the stub registry, letting an Issuer label any token-holding wallet as a platform wallet and bypass an active lockupFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Securitize’s security record

Securitize
Audits37 audits by 2 firmsLast audit Sep 2026, by Cyfrin.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross the 37 reports, 6 critical findings were reported. Each is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.
Open Securitize’s security record

Security firm

Cyfrin

28 projects reviewed · 79 reports · latest Sep 2026

See Cyfrin’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us