Spark ALM Controller v1.
Audit · firm’s term: security assessment
Certora reviewed Spark (Spark ALM Controller v1.) on 30 May 2026: 6 findings, 0 critical; 2 marked fixed, 4 acknowledged.
No open critical findings
Findings14
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Low | 0 | 4 | 0 |
LowConfiguration validation gap can lead to permanently stuck fundsAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowOverloaded maxSlippages allows bypassing of access controlAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowRelayer can exceed ratelimits by frontrunning a setRateLimitData transactionAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowRelayer can swap outside of rate limits by adding liquidity, imbalancing the pool, and then burning liquidityAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Part of Spark’s security record
SparkAudits33 audits by 3 firmsLast audit Aug 2026, by Cantina.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 33 reports.
Open Spark’s security recordSecurity firm
Certora29 projects reviewed · 56 reports · latest Aug 2026
See Certora’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us