StepD
Cyberscope reviewed StepD on 8 Apr 2022: 4 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen StepD’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash bafkreiaxguq2hitk3n2qyv7zm2q6jrku2sg56bblgmzxy3gx6zvynew36a
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from this report. Trustblock does not review code.
Findings4
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 4 | 0 | 0 |
LowL01 - Public Function could be Declared ExternalNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
LowL02 - State Variables could be Declared ConstantNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
LowL04 - Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
LowL05 - Unused State VariableNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x2582d7afc1bf4496bcb87b6c2a72d24db279dd0e | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of StepD’s security record
StepDAudits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Apr 2022, by Cyberscope.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open StepD’s security recordSecurity firm
Cyberscope1,777 projects reviewed · 2,050 reports · latest Sep 2026
See Cyberscope’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us