Lido Vault Middleware Audit Report

CyfrinCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Audit · firm’s term: audit report

Cyfrin reviewed Lido (Lido Vault Middleware Audit Report) on 19 Dec 2025: 5 findings, 0 critical; all marked fixed.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Lido’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings5

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High000
Medium000
Low005

Marked Informational or Gas by the firm. Not counted as findings.

InformationalNot including _decimalsOffset when calculating the fee sharesAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

InformationalEmergencyVault::activateRecovery NatSpec references wrong event nameFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalIn Solidity don’t initialize to default valuesFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalnonReentrant is not the first modifierFixed

The report gives no description here.

GasUse more efficient method of reading recipient account and basis pointsFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalUse named mappings to explicitly denote the purpose of keys and valuesFixed

The report gives no description here.

GasUse ReentrancyGuardTransient for faster nonReentrant modifiersFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalVault::decimals does not reflect correct decimals when OFFSET is usedFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Lido’s security record

Lido
Audits54 audits by 13 firmsLast audit Sep 2026, by Composable Security.
Critical findings2 criticals acknowledged, not fixedReported in 2 reports, the latest by Statemind, Apr 2023. The team acknowledged both.
Open Lido’s security record

Security firm

Cyfrin

28 projects reviewed · 79 reports · latest Sep 2026

See Cyfrin’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us