Chainwars
SolidProof reviewed Chain Wars (Chainwars) on 24 Feb 2022: 4 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Chain Wars’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash Qmd8W9C8BVDPa8gjYxmpTA45US9YsEeBGFhcWH17HqbGxK
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from this report. Trustblock does not review code.
Findings4
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Low#1: Contract doesn’t import npm packages from source (like OpenZeppelin etc.)Not fixed
The report gives no description here.
Low#1: Functions that are not usedNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
Low#2: Unused contractNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
Low#3: NatSpec documentation missingNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Part of Chain Wars’s security record
Chain WarsAudits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Feb 2022, by SolidProof.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Chain Wars’s security recordSecurity firm
SolidProof1,127 projects reviewed · 1,478 reports · latest Feb 2025
See SolidProof’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us