CATLY
Audit · firm’s term: audit report
Cyberscope reviewed CATLY on 1 Jul 2023: 17 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings17
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 15 | 0 | 0 |
MediumFRV - Fee Restoration VulnerabilityOpen
The report gives no description here.
MediumST - Stops TransactionsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowIDI - Immutable Declaration ImprovementOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL02 - State Variables could be Declared ConstantOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL04 - Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL07 - Missing Events ArithmeticOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL13 - Divide before Multiply OperationOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL14 - Uninitialized Variables in Local ScopeOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL16 - Validate Variable SettersOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL19 - Stable Compiler VersionOpen
The report gives no description here.
Show 7 more
LowL20 - Succeeded Transfer CheckOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowMEE - Missing Events EmissionOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowMMN - Misleading Method NamingOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowPTRP - Potential Transfer Revert PropagationOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowPVC - Price Volatility ConcernOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowRED - Redundant Event DeclarationOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowRSML - Redundant SafeMath LibraryOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x1d78d8b0a7c88421a644230d3e54c8799e30a0a0 | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of CATLY’s security record
Security firm
Cyberscope1,783 projects reviewed · 2,056 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Cyberscope’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us