Biconomy security review
Pashov Audit Group reviewed Biconomy (Biconomy security review) on 26 Nov 2025: 5 findings, 0 critical; all marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Biconomy’s security record
Report hosted on GitHub.
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from this report. Trustblock does not review code.
Findings5
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 0 | 0 | 4 |
HighIncorrect assembly packing in getNamespace causes collisionsFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowAssembly errors not declared in the interfaceFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowFree memory pointer not updatedFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowInvalid EIP-712 Domain TypehashFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowPREPInitialized event emitted but not declaredFixed
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Part of Biconomy’s security record
BiconomyAudits3 audits by 2 firmsLast audit May 2026, by Pashov Audit Group.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 3 reports.
Open Biconomy’s security recordSecurity firm
Pashov Audit Group30 projects reviewed · 53 reports · latest Jul 2026
See Pashov Audit Group’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us