Regeneration Credit security review

Nethermind Security4 Oct 2025Code version: not recorded (see the report)

Audit · firm’s term: security review

Nethermind Security reviewed Regeneration (Regeneration Credit security review) on 4 Oct 2025: 8 findings, 0 critical; 7 marked fixed, 1 open.

No open critical findings

Open the report Open Regeneration’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings8

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

Severity	Open	Acknowledged	Fixed
Critical	0	0	0
High	1	0	3
Medium	0	0	3
Low	0	0	1

HighFraud Reporting Mechanism Fails to Protect Protocol IntegrityFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighInspectors Are Unfairly Penalized When Detecting Invalid RegeneratorsFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighInspectors Can Inflate Ecological Value to Profit from Token SalesFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumAny type of user can accept invitation from denied usersFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumRisk of Fake Delations Undermining User Reputation SystemFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumUnexecuted Inspections may Block Regenerator RewardsFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowThe average level decreases when denied users are included in the vote power computationFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Regeneration’s security record

Regeneration

Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Oct 2025, by Nethermind Security.

Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.

Open Regeneration’s security record

Security firm

Nethermind Security

57 projects reviewed · 81 reports · latest Sep 2026

See Nethermind Security’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.