Cactus Reward Token
Audit · firm’s term: audit report
Cyberscope reviewed Cactus Reward Token on 15 Feb 2023: 7 findings, 1 critical; 1 acknowledged, 6 open.
1 critical acknowledged, not fixed
Open the reportOpen Cactus Reward Token’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash bafkreigfneiulusdvk2ypfmdngi4tfdzy7kktrm3fvjh7v3ll2hgzqol3a
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings7
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 6 | 0 | 0 |
LowL02 - State Variables could be Declared ConstantOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL04 - Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL07 - Missing Events ArithmeticOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL13 - Divide before Multiply OperationOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL16 - Validate Variable SettersOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL19 - Stable Compiler VersionOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x28cf95076cc52cfb6339dadff8150db1a5958e55 | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of Cactus Reward Token’s security record
Cactus Reward Token
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Feb 2023, by Cyberscope.
Critical findings1 critical acknowledged, not fixedReported in “Cactus Reward Token” by Cyberscope, Feb 2023. The team acknowledged it.
Open Cactus Reward Token’s security recordSecurity firm
Cyberscope1,783 projects reviewed · 2,056 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Cyberscope’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us