GMX Crosschain V2.2 5 Report

Guardian Audits26 Jul 2025Code version: not recorded (see the report)

Audit · firm’s term: security review

Part of Guardian Audits’ series

Guardian Audits reviewed GMX (GMX Crosschain V2.2 5 Report) on 26 Jul 2025: 19 findings, 0 critical; 9 marked fixed, 10 acknowledged.

No open critical findings

Open the report Open GMX’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings19

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

Severity	Open	Acknowledged	Fixed
Critical	0	0	0
High	0	0	1
Medium	0	1	3
Low	0	9	5

MediumPrice Impact Factor GamingAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowConfig Keeper Trusted To Set ProvidersAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowDocumentation Regarding WithdrawalsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowExecution Cost Greater Than Provided FeeAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowIncreased Signature ProtectionAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowLoss Of Signature Cancelability And SequentialityAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing Gas Limit Config ParamsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowOrder Cancels Do Not Update lastSrcChainIdAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowProvider May Be Immediately UpdatedAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowUnnecessary Reordering Of Transfer StepsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of GMX’s security record

GMX

Audits38 audits by 1 firmLast audit Apr 2026, by Guardian Audits.

Critical findings1 critical acknowledged, not fixedReported in “GMX VesterCap Updates” by Guardian Audits, Jul 2024. The team acknowledged it.

Open GMX’s security record

Security firm

Guardian Audits

15 projects reviewed · 99 reports · latest Aug 2026

See Guardian Audits’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.