ZIGChain audit

Oak SecurityCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Oak Security reviewed ZIGChain (ZIGChain audit) on 25 Aug 2025: 23 findings, 2 critical; 21 marked fixed, 2 acknowledged.

2 critical findings, fixed
Open the reportOpen ZIGChain’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings23

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical002
High006
Medium000
Low0213
CriticalIncorrect token amount can be added to the pool reservesFixed

The report gives no description here.

CriticalMalicious chains can send IBC packets to steal funds from the tokenwrapper moduleFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighBurning tokens does not increase minting capacityFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighDisabling the tokenwrapper module prevents IBC packets from being transferredFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighFees are not incurred during MsgSwapExactOutFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighIncorrect token refund mechanism may result in users receiving the wrong tokensFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighInsufficient uzig coins in the module balance may cause IBC incoming transfers to failFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighPacket Forward Middleware (PFM) is not implementedFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowDenomAuth validation function incorrectly rejects empty admin stringsFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowImbalanced liquidity deposits can lead to immediate lossFixed

The report gives no description here.

Show 10 more
LowIncomplete GenesisState validation in the tokenwrapper module may lead to an invalid stateFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowIncomplete validation in the Pool function may allow invalid addressesFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowIncorrect pagination handling in DenomsByAdmin may lead to inaccurate resultsFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowIncorrect permission handling denies metadata access to bank adminsFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowInput string modification before validation violates best practicesFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowInsecure default keyring backendFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowInsufficient validation of CreateFeeDenom in UpdateParams may prevent denom creationFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowLack of cross-validation between DenomList and DenomAuthList may lead to an invalid stateFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing MINIMAL_LIQUIDITY lock when minting first depositor share tokensFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing upper bound check on decimalDifferenceFixed

The report gives no description here.

Show 1 more
LowOverwriting fields in ValidateBasic will not persist during actual executionFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of ZIGChain’s security record

ZIGChain
Audits5 audits by 1 firmLast audit May 2026, by Oak Security.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross the 5 reports, 7 critical findings were reported. Each is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.
Open ZIGChain’s security record

Security firm

Oak Security

33 projects reviewed · 60 reports · latest May 2026

See Oak Security’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us