EmpaFee

CertiKCode version: not recorded (see the report)

CertiK reviewed EmpaFee on 23 Jul 2024: 7 findings, 0 critical; 4 marked fixed, 3 open.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen EmpaFee’s security record

Report hosted on skynet.certik.com.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings7

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High101
Medium000
Low203
HighInitial Token DistributionOpen

All of the `1 * 1e9 * 1e18` `EPF` tokens are sent to the contract deployer or one or several externally-owned account (EOA) addresses. This is a centralization risk because the deployer or the owner(s) of the EOAs can distribute tokens without obtaining the consensus of the community. Any compromise to these addresses may allow a hacker to steal and sell tokens on the market, resulting in severe damage to the project.

LowPotential Sandwich AttacksOpen

A sandwich attack might happen when an attacker observes a transaction swapping tokens or adding liquidity without setting restrictions on slippage or minimum output amount. The attacker can manipulate the exchange rate by frontrunning (before the transaction being attacked) a transaction to purchase one of the assets and make profits by backrunning (after the transaction being attacked) a transaction to sell the asset. The following functions are called without setting restrictions on slippage or minimum output amount, so transactions triggering these functions are vulnerable to sandwich attacks, especially when the input amount is large: - `swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens()` - `swapExactTokensForTokensSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens()` - `addLiquidityETH()`

LowVariables That Could Be Declared as ImmutableOpen

The linked variables assigned in the constructor can be declared as `immutable`. Immutable state variables can be assigned during contract creation but will remain constant throughout the lifetime of a deployed contract. A big advantage of immutable variables is that reading them is significantly cheaper than reading from regular state variables since they will not be stored in storage. ```solidity=870 uint256 public maxWallet; ```

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of EmpaFee’s security record

EmpaFee
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Jul 2024, by CertiK.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open EmpaFee’s security record

Security firm

CertiK

1,044 projects reviewed · 1,375 reports · latest May 2025

See CertiK’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us