MetaSwap
Audit · firm’s term: audit report
Cyberscope reviewed MetaSwap on 12 Jul 2022: 8 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen MetaSwap’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash bafkreiedloof7vqbhaotjcybwhs4rxxmlzx3k7bz6irfqe4lyhxirymyjy
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings8
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 8 | 0 | 0 |
LowBLC - Business Logic ConcernOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowCO - Code OptimizationOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowFSA - Fixed Swap AddressOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL01 - Public Function could be Declared ExternalOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL02 - State Variables could be Declared ConstantOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL04 - Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL07 - Missing Events ArithmeticOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL09 - Dead Code EliminationOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0xeacad6c99965cde0f31513dd72de79fa24610767 | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of MetaSwap’s security record
MetaSwapAudits3 audits by 1 firmLast audit Jul 2022, by Cyberscope.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 3 reports.
Open MetaSwap’s security recordSecurity firm
Cyberscope1,784 projects reviewed · 2,059 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Cyberscope’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us