As of 3 Nov 2026, BabyCate has 1 audit report on Trustblock, by CertiK, dated 8 Oct 2024. That report lists no open critical findings. It also holds 1 deployed contract on 1 chain.
Record last updated . It holds audits, findings and contracts up to Nov 2026, and incidents up to Oct 2026. Trustblock does not review code.
Newest first
| Audit | Security firm | Date | Scope | Critical findings | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BabyCate - Audit | Security firm: CertiK | Date: | Scope: 1 address on BNB Chain | No open critical findings | Open · skynet.certik.com |
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Medium | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Low | 0 | 3 | 3 |
In the contract `BabyCate`, the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority and exclude or include accounts from fees, set automated market maker pair status, update the transfer fees, retrieve stuck tokens, set the swap tokens amount, toggle swap back status, update the sell fees, update the buy fees, and set the marketing wallet.  In the contract `Ownable`, the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority and transfer the ownership, renounce contract ownership. 
Open the reportThe `isContract` check cannot cover all scenarios. The check can be bypassed if the call is from the constructor of a contract or when the contract is destroyed. In that case, `isContract` will return `false` because its `codesize` will be zero. The comment in the `isContract` implementation from the OpenZeppelin library also says that "item_output is unsafe to assume that an address for which this function returns false is an externally-owned account (EOA), and not a contract." - Reference: https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/3dac7bbed7b4c0dbf504180c33e8ed8e350b93eb/contracts/utils/Address.sol ```solidity=1133 require( !isContract(_marketingWallet), "Marketing wallet cannot be a contract" ); ```
Open the reportThe change of `_owner` by function `transferOwnership()` overrides the previously set `_owner` with the new one without guaranteeing the new `_owner` is able to actuate transactions on-chain.
Open the reportIt is not recommended to use Solidity's `transfer()` and `send()` functions for transferring native tokens, since some contracts may not be able to receive the funds. Those functions forward only a fixed amount of gas (2300 specifically) and the receiving contracts may run out of gas before finishing the transfer. Also, EVM instructions' gas costs may increase in the future. Thus, some contracts that can receive now may stop working in the future due to the gas limitation. ```solidity=1116 payable(msg.sender).transfer(address(this).balance); ``` - `BabyCate.claimStuckTokens` uses `transfer()`.
Open the report| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x76b5…be790x76b560b628f74bf192be09f0449abef8e456be79 | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.
Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.
<head><script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script></head><body><divdata-tb-project-widgetdata-tb-project-slug="babycate"></div></body>
Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.
Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us