As of 3 Nov 2026, Balto Coin Official has 1 audit report on Trustblock, by CertiK, dated 29 Nov 2024. That report lists no open critical findings. It also holds 1 deployed contract on 1 chain.
Record last updated . It holds audits and findings, contracts and incidents up to Nov 2026. Trustblock does not review code.
Newest first
| Audit | Security firm | Date | Scope | Critical findings | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balto - audit | Security firm: CertiK | Date: | Scope: 1 address on Ethereum | No open critical findings | Open · skynet.certik.com |
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 0 | 3 | 0 |
All of the `359015678856 * 10**9` tokens are sent to the contract deployer or one or several externally-owned account (EOA) addresses. This is a centralization risk because the deployer or the owner(s) of the EOAs can distribute tokens without obtaining the consensus of the community. Any compromise to these addresses may allow a hacker to steal and sell tokens on the market, resulting in severe damage to the project.
Open the reportIn the Uniswap AMM system, a deadline is typically set for token swaps to prevent transactions from being executed after a certain amount of time, which could result in unfavorable price slippage. However, in the current contract, when conducting transactions using the Uniswap function, the deadline is set to `block.timestamp` or more than `block.timstamp`, meaning `the deadline check will pass whatever block the transaction is in` due to the check of deadline `require(deadline >= block.timestamp, 'UniswapV2Router: EXPIRED')` which will always pass. If bots and maximal extractable value (MEV) strategies are widely used, it could affect many transactions. A malicious miner can hold the transaction as he wants to incur the maximum loss is reached. Therefore, the absence or incorrect usage of a deadline could make transactions more susceptible to front-running / MEV attacks, leading to greater price slippage losses.
Open the reportA sandwich attack can occur when an attacker notices a transaction involving token swaps or liquidity additions that lacks slippage restrictions or minimum output amount settings. The attacker can exploit this by frontrunning the transaction to purchase one of the assets, thereby manipulating the exchange rate, and then backrunning the transaction to sell the asset for a profit. The referenced functions are invoked without setting slippage restrictions or minimum output amounts, making transactions that trigger these functions particularly vulnerable to sandwich attacks, especially when large input amounts are involved.
Open the reportThe current implementation of the `if` clause is redundant and is not taking any effect. It can be simply removed, making the code clearer and more straightforward.
Open the report| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0xc773…d13b0xc77336fdd91e22c737b0f5ec33f4c429caa1d13b | Chain: Ethereum | Source code: Verified source |
Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.
Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.
<head><script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script></head><body><divdata-tb-project-widgetdata-tb-project-slug="balto"></div></body>
Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.
Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us