BlastOff security record

Blast, Ethereumblastoff.zoneXGitHub

As of 4 Nov 2026, BlastOff has 1 audit report on Trustblock, by Zokyo, dated 14 Mar 2024. That report lists no open critical findings.

Critical findings
No open critical findings
In that report, 1 critical finding was reported. It is marked fixed by the firm that reported it. See the findings
Open the latest report
Your label, live
Get the label for your site

Record last updated . It holds audits and findings, contracts and incidents up to Nov 2026. Trustblock does not review code.

Audits1

Newest first

AuditSecurity firmDateScopeCritical findingsReport
BlastOff Smart Contracts ReviewSecurity firm: ZokyoDate: Scope: Repository at commit d9164fc1 critical finding, fixedOpen · IPFS

Findings16

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical001
High002
Medium003
Low307
CriticalUnauthorized Withdrawal of Staked ETH via repayWithStakeToken FunctionBlastOff Smart Contracts Review · Zokyo · 14 Mar 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
HighIncorrect token transfer source in the stake function of NonLockStakingPools contractBlastOff Smart Contracts Review · Zokyo · 14 Mar 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
HighPossibility of griefing users via front-runningBlastOff Smart Contracts Review · Zokyo · 14 Mar 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
MediumIncorrect Logic to Prevent Excessive StakingBlastOff Smart Contracts Review · Zokyo · 14 Mar 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
MediumMisplaced stake limit validation in stake function of LockedStakingPools contractBlastOff Smart Contracts Review · Zokyo · 14 Mar 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
MediumPremature Finalization Vulnerability in IDOPoolAbstract ContractBlastOff Smart Contracts Review · Zokyo · 14 Mar 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowLack of Input Validation for setTokenPriceInUSD FunctionBlastOff Smart Contracts Review · Zokyo · 14 Mar 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowMissing Event EmissionBlastOff Smart Contracts Review · Zokyo · 14 Mar 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowMissing Event Emissions for Critical ActionsBlastOff Smart Contracts Review · Zokyo · 14 Mar 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowRedundant Assignment of idoSize in finalize FunctionBlastOff Smart Contracts Review · Zokyo · 14 Mar 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
Show 3 more
LowUpgradeable contracts missing method to disable initializers for implementation contractsBlastOff Smart Contracts Review · Zokyo · 14 Mar 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowUse of single step ownership transferBlastOff Smart Contracts Review · Zokyo · 14 Mar 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowZero Address CheckBlastOff Smart Contracts Review · Zokyo · 14 Mar 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report

Contracts

No deployed address is recorded for these audits.

The reports name a repository or files. Open a report to see its scope.

The repositories and files the reports name

Show this on your site

Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.

Content

Facts

Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.

Fixed as
Language

Style

Layout
Theme
Accent
Corners

Format

Size
Date
Embed as
HTML
<head>
<script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script>
</head>
<body>
<div
data-tb-project-widget
data-tb-project-slug="blastoff"
></div>
</body>

Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us