Dora Factory security record
As of 21 Oct 2026, Dora Factory has 4 audit reports by 2 security firms on Trustblock; the latest is by Oak Security, dated 13 Jun 2024. Those reports list 1 critical acknowledged and not fixed. It also holds 1 deployed contract on 1 chain.
Record last updated . It holds audits and findings, contracts and incidents up to Oct 2026. Trustblock does not review code.
Audits4
Newest first
| Audit | Security firm | Date | Scope | Critical findings | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dora Vota audit | Security firm: Oak Security | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | 1 critical acknowledged, not fixed | Open · GitHub |
| DORA ERC20 Contract Update-Audit | Security firm: CertiK | Date: | Scope: 1 address on Ethereum | No open critical findings | Open · skynet.certik.com |
| Dora Grant DAO V4 | Security firm: CertiK | Date: | Scope: Files named in the report | No open critical findings | Open · skynet.certik.com |
| Aptos Grant DAO-Audit | Security firm: CertiK | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | No open critical findings | Open · skynet.certik.com |
Findings32
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| High | 2 | 5 | 1 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Low | 8 | 2 | 12 |
CriticalInfinite gas allocated per block allows attackers to halt the chainDora Vota audit · Oak Security · 13 Jun 2024Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighInconsistency between evidence and staking parameters allows malicious validators to escape penaltiesDora Vota audit · Oak Security · 13 Jun 2024Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighOversized maximum block size could allow DoS attacksDora Vota audit · Oak Security · 13 Jun 2024Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighUsage of deprecated x/crisis module allows attackers to execute DoS attacksDora Vota audit · Oak Security · 13 Jun 2024Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighInitial Token DistributionDORA ERC20 Contract Update-Audit · CertiK · 20 Aug 2023Acknowledged
All of the DORA tokens are sent to the `_founder` address. This is a centralization risk because the `_founder` can distribute tokens without obtaining the consensus of the community. Any compromise to the address may allow a hacker to steal and sell tokens on the market, resulting in severe damage to the project.
Open the reportHighCentralization Related RisksDora Grant DAO V4 · CertiK · 6 Mar 2023Acknowledged
In the contract `DoraChecker` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions: * setWhitelist() * freeze() * unFreeze() * slash() Any compromise to the `_owner` or access to the functions may allow a hacker to do the following: - put account to white list. The hacker could add his account to the white list which could allow him to get the slashed funds. - free or unfreeze user staking account. The hacker could use this authority to freeze user staking account and slash him. Or unfreeze bad accounts to let them get funds. - slash specific user staking account. The hacker could use this authority to slash some accounts and get their funds. --- In the contract `DoraChecker` the users on the `whitelist` have authority over the functions: * slashTo() Any compromise to the `whitelist` or access to the functions may allow a hacker to do the following: - get slashed funds. The hacker could use this authority to transfer slashed funds to any account. --- In the contract `StakingEntry` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions: * setAdmin() * addSigningKeys() Any compromise to the `_owner` or access to the functions may allow a hacker to do the following: - add signature information. The hacker could use this authority to forbidden specific accounts to use deposit function.
Open the reportLowFunction `approve` of Contract `ERC20` Does Not PDORA ERC20 Contract Update-Audit · CertiK · 20 Aug 2023Acknowledged
It is expected that calls of the form `approve(spender, amount)` fail if the address in `spender` is the zero address.
Open the reportLowFunction `transferFrom` of Contract `ERC20` DoesDORA ERC20 Contract Update-Audit · CertiK · 20 Aug 2023Acknowledged
It is expected that calls of the form `transferFrom(from, dest, amount)` fail if the `from` address is zero.
Open the reportContracts1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x70b790d0948a760e80bc3f892b142f7779b538b2 | Chain: Ethereum | Source code: Verified source |
Show this on your site
Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.
Content
Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.
Style
Format
<head><script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script></head><body><divdata-tb-project-widgetdata-tb-project-slug="dora-factory"></div></body>
Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.
Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us