GAMI World security record

In the contract `GamiToken`, the role `onlyOwner` has the authority over the following function: - `setAccountLimit()` - Sets Account limit - `setSingleTransferLimit()` - Sets single transfer limit - `setAccountLimitExclusion()` - Sets an account exclude from balance limit - `setTransferLimitExclusion()` - Sets an account exclude from transfer limit - `setBotsBlacklisting()` - Sets accounts as blacklist - `burn()`- Burns tokens, callable only by the owner - `blacklist()`,`unblacklist()` - Adds or removes an address to blacklist - `pause()`,`unpause()` - Pauses or unpauses token transfers - `changeMinter()` - Changes minter Any compromise to the `onlyOwner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this.

There should always be events emitted in the sensitive functions that are controlled by centralization roles.

The given input is missing the check for the non-zero address.

This contract establishes the distribution plan for **GAMI** tokens. In the `initialize()` function, the total number of tokens has been fully distributed and the total supply has reached the maximum limit of 150 million as specified in the white paper. All tokens in `presaleLocked` will then be unlocked as planned over a 10-year period. However, the current logic is not as clear and effective as we thought, and some of the problems are listed below. 1. Once the `miner` role calls the `mint()` method, the total supply will exceed the maximum and the `OnlyOwner` must burn the same amount to maintain the balance, which may require the consumption of many extra gases. 2. There is no limit to the total amount of tokens minted in the contract.