GLIF security record

As of 21 Oct 2026, GLIF has 3 audit reports by 1 security firm on Trustblock; the latest is by Hexens, dated 10 Dec 2025. Those reports list no open critical findings.

Critical findings
No open critical findings
Across the 3 reports, 1 critical finding was reported. It is marked fixed by the firm that reported it. See the findings
Open the latest report
Your label, live
Get the label for your site

Record last updated . It holds audits and findings, contracts and incidents up to Oct 2026. Trustblock does not review code.

Audits3

Newest first

AuditSecurity firmDateScopeCritical findingsReport
Glif Plus security reviewSecurity firm: HexensDate: Scope: Not recorded (see the report)No open critical findingsOpen · GitHub
Glif Plus security reviewSecurity firm: HexensDate: Scope: Not recorded (see the report)No open critical findingsOpen · GitHub
Glif security reviewSecurity firm: HexensDate: Scope: Not recorded (see the report)1 critical finding, fixedOpen · GitHub

Findings24

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical001
High005
Medium033
Low048
CriticalAuthorization bypass in LiquidityMineSP allows attacker to steal unclaimed reward tokensGlif security review · Hexens · 5 Aug 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
HighIncorrect Calculation of stakingTotalYbt When Setting Window RootGlif Plus security review · Hexens · 10 Dec 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
HighIncorrect Use of _windowStart as _windowId in _binarySearchWindowId CallGlif Plus security review · Hexens · 10 Dec 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
HighIncorrect GLF/FIL price calculation in onPaymentMadeGlif Plus security review · Hexens · 4 Sep 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
HighPersonal cashback percentage can be changed by anyoneGlif Plus security review · Hexens · 4 Sep 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
HighAsset Loss Due to Insufficient Liquid Assets When Using Redeem FunctionGlif security review · Hexens · 5 Aug 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
MediumInconsistent Interest Rate for Accounts During Multi-Block Rate Update ProcessGlif security review · Hexens · 5 Aug 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
MediumIncorrect rounding in the previewRedeem and previewMint functionsGlif security review · Hexens · 5 Aug 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
MediumThe writeOff() function should not be allowed to trigger when the pool is paused for updating the interest rateGlif security review · Hexens · 5 Aug 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowFull removal of YBT or RWT can be DoSedGlif Plus security review · Hexens · 10 Dec 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
Show 7 more
LowThe fundGlfVault function should check whether the token ID is activeGlif Plus security review · Hexens · 4 Sep 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowThe mintAndActivate function only works when the sender is the recipientGlif Plus security review · Hexens · 4 Sep 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
Low`withdrawAndHarvest` function use the same amount for both actionsGlif security review · Hexens · 5 Aug 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowInfinityPoolV2.setTreasuryFeeRa te() will act retroactively if called on pauseGlif security review · Hexens · 5 Aug 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowLiquidityMineLP._computeAccRew ards() takes into account tokens without an open positionGlif security review · Hexens · 5 Aug 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowThe Withdraw event will be duplicated in several functionsGlif security review · Hexens · 5 Aug 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowValidation is missing to ensure the agent was liquidated before `writeOff`Glif security review · Hexens · 5 Aug 2024Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report

Contracts

No deployed address is recorded for these audits.

The reports name a repository or files. Open a report to see its scope.

Show this on your site

Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.

Content

Facts

Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.

Fixed as
Language

Style

Layout
Theme
Accent
Corners

Format

Size
Date
Embed as
HTML
<head>
<script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script>
</head>
<body>
<div
data-tb-project-widget
data-tb-project-slug="glif"
></div>
</body>

Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us