Glow Token V2 security record

BNB Chain

As of 3 Nov 2026, Glow Token V2 has 1 audit report on Trustblock, by CertiK, dated 3 Aug 2022. That report lists 1 open critical finding. It also holds 1 deployed contract on 1 chain.

Critical findings
1 open critical finding
Reported in “Glow Token V2” by CertiK, Aug 2022. Not marked fixed in that report. See the findings
Open the latest report
Your label, live
Get the label for your site

Record last updated . It holds audits, findings and contracts up to Nov 2026, and incidents up to Oct 2026. Trustblock does not review code.

Audits1

Newest first

AuditSecurity firmDateScopeCritical findingsReport
Glow Token V2Security firm: CertiKDate: Scope: 1 address on BNB Chain1 open critical findingOpen · skynet.certik.com

Findings29

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical100
High045
Medium031
Low1302
CriticalPotential Out-of-Gas ExceptionGlow Token V2 · CertiK · 3 Aug 2022Open

In the function `_processRewards`, the gas may be insufficient in the last iteration of the while-loop, which will lead to the reversion of EVM. The function `_transfer` calls the function `_processRewards` when selling, so it may cause the sell transaction can not be executed successfully.

Open the report
Low`_nonce` Never ChangedGlow Token V2 · CertiK · 3 Aug 2022Open

The variable `_nonce` is used in function `_random` to make a random number. However, it is always the initial zero and never changed.

Open the report
LowAddress Type Could Be Indexed In EventsGlow Token V2 · CertiK · 3 Aug 2022Open

It is recommended to add `indexed` keyword for parameters in events, which makes it easier for users to navigate event logs.

Open the report
LowCheck Effect Interaction Pattern ViolatedGlow Token V2 · CertiK · 3 Aug 2022Open

The order of external call/transfer and storage manipulation must follow the check-effect-interaction pattern.

Open the report
LowMiscalculation of Max HoldingGlow Token V2 · CertiK · 3 Aug 2022Open

In function `_buyTokens`, the transaction may be charged fees, so the max holding of receiver should be `_balances[recipient] + amount - tokenTax`. The fees should not be calculated in the max holding.

Open the report
LowMissing Approval OperationGlow Token V2 · CertiK · 3 Aug 2022Open

In function `_addLiquidity` and `_swapTokensForBNB`, the `_pancakeRouter` transfers token without approval. Although the `_pancakeRouter` is approved with the max allowance in the constructor, the allowance may be decrease to an insufficient amount over time. Besides, if the router has been changed, there will no allowance for the new router, which will cause reversion of transaction.

Open the report
LowMissing Error MessagesGlow Token V2 · CertiK · 3 Aug 2022Open

The **require** can be used to check for conditions and throw an exception if the condition is not met. It is better to provide a string message containing details about the error that will be passed back to the caller. But there are a lot of `require`s in the code that do not have error messages.

Open the report
LowMissing Event for `address(this)`Glow Token V2 · CertiK · 3 Aug 2022Open

In the function `_transferIncluded`, the `newAmount` is sent to `recipient` and the `tokenTax` is sent to `address(this)`. So only emit for `recipient` is not enough.

Open the report
LowMissing Input ValidationGlow Token V2 · CertiK · 3 Aug 2022Open

There are many functions in the contract which do not check for the given input values, such as zero address validation, BEP20 token address validation.

Open the report
LowPotential Sandwich AttacksGlow Token V2 · CertiK · 3 Aug 2022Open

A sandwich attack might happen when an attacker observes a transaction swapping tokens or adding liquidity without setting restrictions on slippage or minimum output amount. The attacker can manipulate the exchange rate by frontrunning (before the transaction being attacked) a transaction to purchase one of the assets and make profits by backrunning (after the transaction being attacked) a transaction to sell the asset. The following functions are called without setting restrictions on slippage or minimum output amount, so transactions triggering these functions are vulnerable to sandwich attacks, especially when the input amount is large: - _pancakeRouter.swapExactETHForTokensSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens() - _pancakeRouter.addLiquidityETH() - _pancakeRouter.removeLiquidityETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens() - _pancakeRouter.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens()

Open the report
Show 4 more
LowThird Party DependenciesGlow Token V2 · CertiK · 3 Aug 2022Open

The contract is serving as the underlying entity to interact with third party protocols. The scope of the audit treats 3rd party entities as black boxes and assume their functional correctness. However, in the real world, 3rd parties can be compromised and this may lead to lost or stolen assets. In addition, upgrades of 3rd parties can possibly create severe impacts, such as increasing fees of 3rd parties, migrating to new LP pools, etc.

Open the report
LowUnlocked Compiler VersionGlow Token V2 · CertiK · 3 Aug 2022Open

The contract has unlocked compiler version. An unlocked compiler version in the source code of the contract permits the user to compile it at or above a particular version. This, in turn, leads to differences in the generated bytecode between compilations due to differing compiler version numbers. This can lead to an ambiguity when debugging as compiler specific bugs may occur in the codebase that would be hard to identify over a span of multiple compiler versions rather than a specific one.

Open the report
LowUnnecessary EventGlow Token V2 · CertiK · 3 Aug 2022Open

In function `transferFrom`, the event `Transfer` is unnecessary and emitted mistakenly. The balance changes of sender and recipient have already been emitted event in function `_transfer`, so there is no need to emit again. Besides, the recipient does not receive the total amount. The tax is for contract address.

Open the report
LowUpdate AMM MistakenlyGlow Token V2 · CertiK · 3 Aug 2022Open

Only when `enabled` is true, `_excludeAccountFromRewards(AMM)` is needed. In this way, the EVM will revert transaction if `enabled` is false. Besides, it is better to exclude the AMM account from lottery as well. ```solidity function ownerUpdateAMM(address AMM,bool enabled) public onlyOwner { _automatedMarketMakers[AMM]=enabled; _excludeAccountFromRewards(AMM); emit OwnerUpdateAMM(AMM,enabled); } ```

Open the report

Contracts1

AddressChainSource code
0xef3725d9e4b9d758483c86be917ab7321dc2830cChain: BNB ChainSource code: Verified source

Show this on your site

Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.

Content

Facts

Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.

Fixed as
Language

Style

Layout
Theme
Accent
Corners

Format

Size
Date
Embed as
HTML
<head>
<script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script>
</head>
<body>
<div
data-tb-project-widget
data-tb-project-slug="glow-token-v2"
></div>
</body>

Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us