Multiliquid SVM security record

As of 10 Nov 2026, Multiliquid SVM has 1 audit report on Trustblock, by Zellic, dated 14 Aug 2026. That report lists no open critical findings.

Critical findings
No open critical findings
In 1 report.
Open the latest report
Your label, live
Get the label for your site

Record last updated . It holds audits and findings, contracts and incidents up to Nov 2026. Trustblock does not review code.

Audits1

Newest first

ReportSecurity firmDateScopeCritical findingsSource
Multiliquid SVM security assessmentSecurity firm: ZellicDate: Scope: Not recorded; see the reportNone openGitHub ↗

Findings19

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High000
Medium013
Low012

Marked Informational by the firms. Not counted as findings.

InformationalClosing one pair requires clearing the LP's shared Treasury positionMultiliquid SVM security assessment · Zellic · 14 Aug 2026Acknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalFailure of the fee-token NAV disables every swapMultiliquid SVM security assessment · Zellic · 14 Aug 2026Acknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalImmediate LP fee changes can invalidate swaps without quote limitsMultiliquid SVM security assessment · Zellic · 14 Aug 2026Acknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalNAV aggregation fails closed when any configured source is unavailableMultiliquid SVM security assessment · Zellic · 14 Aug 2026Acknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalTreasury losses are realized by the users who redeem lastMultiliquid SVM security assessment · Zellic · 14 Aug 2026Acknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalTreasury-token transfers do not transfer the corresponding redemption entitlementMultiliquid SVM security assessment · Zellic · 14 Aug 2026Acknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
Informationalclose_pair performs an unguarded hook-aware zero-amount transferMultiliquid SVM security assessment · Zellic · 14 Aug 2026Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalDeposits can be accepted before the first APY entry makes redemption possibleMultiliquid SVM security assessment · Zellic · 14 Aug 2026Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalDuplicate NAV sources can bias the aggregated priceMultiliquid SVM security assessment · Zellic · 14 Aug 2026Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalGlobal configuration initialization is not restricted to the upgrade authorityMultiliquid SVM security assessment · Zellic · 14 Aug 2026Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
Show 2 more
InformationalManager's ambient signature is exposed to asset transfer hooksMultiliquid SVM security assessment · Zellic · 14 Aug 2026Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalTreasury deposit and redeem lack slippage and deadline protectionMultiliquid SVM security assessment · Zellic · 14 Aug 2026Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report

Contracts

No deployed address is recorded for these audits.

The reports name a repository or files. Open a report to see its scope.

Show this on your site

Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.

Content

Facts

Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.

Fixed as
Language

Style

Layout
Theme
Accent
Corners

Format

Size
Date
Embed as
HTML
<head>
<script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script>
</head>
<body>
<div
data-tb-project-widget
data-tb-project-slug="multiliquid-svm"
></div>
</body>

Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us