As of 3 Nov 2026, Pepe Community has 1 audit report on Trustblock, by CertiK, dated 8 Sep 2023. That report lists no open critical findings. It also holds 1 deployed contract on 1 chain.
Record last updated . It holds audits and findings, contracts and incidents up to Nov 2026. Trustblock does not review code.
Newest first
| Audit | Security firm | Date | Scope | Critical findings | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepe Community - Audit | Security firm: CertiK | Date: | Scope: 1 address on Ethereum | No open critical findings | Open · skynet.certik.com |
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Medium | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Low | 12 | 0 | 0 |
All of the `PEPE` tokens are sent to the contract deployer address. This is a centralization risk because the deployer can distribute tokens without obtaining the consensus of the community. Any compromise to this address may allow a hacker to steal and sell tokens on the market, resulting in severe damage to the project. The detailed holder list can be found at: [https://etherscan.io/token/0xbe042e9d09cb588331ff911c2b46fd833a3e5bd6#balances](https://etherscan.io/token/0xbe042e9d09cb588331ff911c2b46fd833a3e5bd6#balances). As of 09/01/2023, the addresses of major holders are listed below: - 3.44% of the tokens are in the address [0x3cc936b795a188f0e246cbb2d74c5bd190aecf18](https://etherscan.io/address/0x3cc936b795a188f0e246cbb2d74c5bd190aecf18) - 2.78% of the tokens are in the address [0xcEFD289a028d1b0a2E3Cd618EDf5a5256a6328CE](https://etherscan.io/address/0xcEFD289a028d1b0a2E3Cd618EDf5a5256a6328CE) - 2.68% of the tokens are in the liquidity pool address [0x8616B44b734817a2C954016A57CF2c4D72D6f838](https://etherscan.io/address/0x8616B44b734817a2C954016A57CF2c4D72D6f838)
Open the reportIn function `_transfer()`, the use of `tx.origin` can be manipulated by an attacker, enabling them to bypass transfer delays or block transfers intended for other users. ```solidity=1146 if (transferDelayEnabled){ if (to != owner() && to != address(uniswapV2Router) && to != address(uniswapV2Pair)){ require(_holderLastTransferTimestamp[tx.origin] < block.number, "_transfer:: Transfer Delay enabled. Only one purchase per block allowed."); _holderLastTransferTimestamp[tx.origin] = block.number; } } ``` The transparency of `tx.origin` is limited within a contract. In a call chain scenario like A->B->C->D, where D is deep within the chain, `msg.sender` in D will represent C, while `tx.origin` will reflect A. If it is crucial to have the original sender's address in D, each function in contracts B, C, and D could incorporate an additional parameter to pass along the origin: A would provide its address (via this) to B, B would transmit the value to C, and C would pass it further to D. Using `tx.origin` for authorization purposes is not recommended in Solidity documentation because it can be exploited by a malicious contract if a legitimate user interacts with it. Therefore, caution should be exercised when relying on `tx.origin` for authorization, and alternative approaches should be considered. Refer to: https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/v0.7.0/security-considerations.html#tx-origin
Open the report| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0xbe04…5bd60xbe042e9d09cb588331ff911c2b46fd833a3e5bd6 | Chain: Ethereum | Source code: Verified source |
Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.
Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.
<head><script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script></head><body><divdata-tb-project-widgetdata-tb-project-slug="pepe-community"></div></body>
Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.
Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us