Sanji Inu security record

BNB Chainsanjiinu.club

As of 3 Nov 2026, Sanji Inu has 2 audit reports by 2 security firms on Trustblock; the latest is by CertiK, dated 22 Sep 2022. Those reports list no open critical findings. It also holds 1 deployed contract on 1 chain.

Critical findings
No open critical findings
Across 2 reports.
Open the latest report
Your label, live
Get the label for your site

Record last updated . It holds audits, findings and contracts up to Nov 2026, and incidents up to Oct 2026. Trustblock does not review code.

Audits2

Newest first

AuditSecurity firmDateScopeCritical findingsReport
Sanji InuSecurity firm: CertiKDate: Scope: 1 address on BNB ChainNo open critical findingsOpen · skynet.certik.com
Sanji InuSecurity firm: CyberscopeDate: Scope: 1 address on BNB ChainNo open critical findingsOpen · IPFS

Findings17

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High030
Medium010
Low1300
HighCentralization Risks in Sanji_Inu.solSanji Inu · CertiK · 22 Sep 2022Acknowledged

In the contract `Ownable` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority. ![](https://accelerator-tasks-prod.acc.corp.certik.com/c2c712fa46174a03a61982fc94f515dc/diagrams/centralization_Sanji_Inu-Ownable-_owner.svg) In the contract `Sanji_Inu` the role `_developmentAddress` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_developmentAddress` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority. ![](https://accelerator-tasks-prod.acc.corp.certik.com/c2c712fa46174a03a61982fc94f515dc/diagrams/centralization_Sanji_Inu-Sanji_Inu-_developmentAddress.svg) In the contract `Sanji_Inu` the role `_marketingAddress` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_marketingAddress` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority. ![](https://accelerator-tasks-prod.acc.corp.certik.com/c2c712fa46174a03a61982fc94f515dc/diagrams/centralization_Sanji_Inu-Sanji_Inu-_marketingAddress.svg) In the contract `Sanji_Inu` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority. ![](https://accelerator-tasks-prod.acc.corp.certik.com/c2c712fa46174a03a61982fc94f515dc/diagrams/centralization_Sanji_Inu-Sanji_Inu-_owner.svg)

Open the report
HighCentralized risk in `sendETHToFee`Sanji Inu · CertiK · 22 Sep 2022Acknowledged

The `sendETHToFee` function transfers BNB to `_developmentAddress/_marketingAddress`. As a result, over time these two addresses will accumulate a significant portion of BNB. And they are EOA (Externally Owned Account), mishandling its private key can have devastating consequences for the project as a whole.

Open the report
HighInitial Token DistributionSanji Inu · CertiK · 22 Sep 2022Acknowledged

All of the SANJI tokens are sent to the contract deployer when deploying the contract. This could be a centralization risk as the deployer can distribute SANJI tokens without obtaining the consensus of the community.

Open the report
MediumPotential Reentrancy Attack (Involving Ether)Sanji Inu · CertiK · 22 Sep 2022Acknowledged

A reentrancy attack can occur when the contract creates a function that makes an external call to another untrusted contract before resolving any effects. If the attacker can control the untrusted contract, they can make a recursive call back to the original function, repeating interactions that would have otherwise not run after the external call resolved the effects. ### External call(s) ```solidity=266 swapTokensForEth(contractTokenBalance); ``` * This function call executes the following external call(s). * In `Sanji_Inu.swapTokensForEth`, * `uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(tokenAmount,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp)` ```solidity=269 sendETHToFee(address(this).balance); ``` * This function call executes the following external call(s). * In `Sanji_Inu.sendETHToFee`, * `_developmentAddress.transfer(amount.div(2))` * In `Sanji_Inu.sendETHToFee`, * `_marketingAddress.transfer(amount.div(2))` * This call sends Ether. ### State variables written after the call(s) ```solidity=290 _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount); ``` * This function call executes the following assignment(s). * In `Sanji_Inu._takeTeam`, * `_rOwned[address(this)] = _rOwned[address(this)].add(rTeam)` * In `Sanji_Inu._transferStandard`, * `_rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount)` * In `Sanji_Inu._transferStandard`, * `_rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount)` ```solidity=290 _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount); ``` * This function call executes the following assignment(s). * In `Sanji_Inu._reflectFee`, * `_rTotal = _rTotal.sub(rFee)`

Open the report

Contracts1

AddressChainSource code
0xa9f059f63cd432b65a723eeeff69304fd780070cChain: BNB ChainSource code: Verified source

Show this on your site

Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.

Content

Facts

Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.

Fixed as
Language

Style

Layout
Theme
Accent
Corners

Format

Size
Date
Embed as
HTML
<head>
<script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script>
</head>
<body>
<div
data-tb-project-widget
data-tb-project-slug="sanji-inu"
></div>
</body>

Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us