Snag Solutions security record

As of 21 Oct 2026, Snag Solutions has 2 audit reports by 2 security firms on Trustblock; the latest is by Halborn, dated 10 Oct 2025. Those reports list no open critical findings.

Critical findings
No open critical findings
Across 2 reports.
Open the latest report
Your label, live
Get the label for your site

Record last updated . It holds audits and findings, contracts and incidents up to Oct 2026. Trustblock does not review code.

Audits2

Newest first

AuditSecurity firmDateScopeCritical findingsReport
Smart Contract AssessmentSecurity firm: HalbornDate: Scope: Not recorded (see the report)No open critical findingsOpen · halborn.com
Snag Solutions / MarketHybridSecurity firm: HackenDate: Scope: Files named in the reportNo open critical findingsOpen · hacken.io

Findings14

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High002
Medium000
Low903

Marked Informational by the firms. Not counted as findings.

Informational__snagFee_init function can be refactored for better structure and readabilitySmart Contract Assessment · Halborn · 10 Oct 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalAlreadyClaimed reused as initialization guardSmart Contract Assessment · Halborn · 10 Oct 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalCross-chain signature replay due to factory domain missing chainIdSmart Contract Assessment · Halborn · 10 Oct 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalDeclared all error imports cleanSmart Contract Assessment · Halborn · 10 Oct 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalEIP-712 signature replay possible in claim function due to missing nonceSmart Contract Assessment · Halborn · 10 Oct 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalFee conversion overflow because of large decimals from price feedSmart Contract Assessment · Halborn · 10 Oct 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalMissing amountStaked > 0 check allows unnecessary bonus logic executionSmart Contract Assessment · Halborn · 10 Oct 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalMissing zero-address and role-existence validation in role management functionsSmart Contract Assessment · Halborn · 10 Oct 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalMissing zero-address check in transferOwnership()Smart Contract Assessment · Halborn · 10 Oct 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalRedundant lockup period validationSmart Contract Assessment · Halborn · 10 Oct 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
Show 2 more
InformationalTransferFailed error is declared but never usedSmart Contract Assessment · Halborn · 10 Oct 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
InformationalUnbounded loop in claimUnlocked() enables DoS via unrestricted caller check in stakeFor() callsSmart Contract Assessment · Halborn · 10 Oct 2025Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report

Contracts

No deployed address is recorded for these audits.

The reports name a repository or files. Open a report to see its scope.

The repositories and files the reports name

Show this on your site

Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.

Content

Facts

Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.

Fixed as
Language

Style

Layout
Theme
Accent
Corners

Format

Size
Date
Embed as
HTML
<head>
<script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script>
</head>
<body>
<div
data-tb-project-widget
data-tb-project-slug="snag-solutions"
></div>
</body>

Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us