Spicenet security record
As of 10 Nov 2026, Spicenet has 1 audit report on Trustblock, by Pashov Audit Group, dated 10 Apr 2026. That report lists no open critical findings.
Record last updated . It holds audits and findings, contracts and incidents up to Nov 2026. Trustblock does not review code.
Audits1
Newest first
| Report | Security firm | Date | Scope | Critical findings | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spicenet security review | Security firm: Pashov Audit Group | Date: | Scope: Not recorded; see the report | None open | GitHub ↗ |
Findings15
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Low | 0 | 4 | 6 |
HighInconsistent token decimal handling in update_mapping functionSpicenet security review · Pashov Audit Group · 10 Apr 2026Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighMissing recipient validation in process_transaction functionSpicenet security review · Pashov Audit Group · 10 Apr 2026Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumFailed withdrawals have no recovery path permanently locking user valuesSpicenet security review · Pashov Audit Group · 10 Apr 2026Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumWithdrawal confirmation burns amounts without validating against stored requestSpicenet security review · Pashov Audit Group · 10 Apr 2026Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumWithdrawal confirmation lacks validation of chain_hash against stored requestSpicenet security review · Pashov Audit Group · 10 Apr 2026Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowAdmin address is immutable no key rotation mechanismSpicenet security review · Pashov Audit Group · 10 Apr 2026Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowInconsistent HashSet implementations across the crateSpicenet security review · Pashov Audit Group · 10 Apr 2026Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowNo validation of log.address in WithdrawalProcessed event enables attackSpicenet security review · Pashov Audit Group · 10 Apr 2026Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowOnly the first call in a signed batch is executed while others are discardedSpicenet security review · Pashov Audit Group · 10 Apr 2026Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSmart contract wallets unable to withdraw funds from L1 escrowSpicenet security review · Pashov Audit Group · 10 Apr 2026Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportShow 1 more
LowWithdrawal requests persist unbounded user- controlled stringsSpicenet security review · Pashov Audit Group · 10 Apr 2026Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportContracts
No deployed address is recorded for these audits.
The reports name a repository or files. Open a report to see its scope.
Show this on your site
Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.
Content
Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.
Style
Format
<head><script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script></head><body><divdata-tb-project-widgetdata-tb-project-slug="spicenet"></div></body>
Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.
Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us