Starknet security record
As of 4 Nov 2026, Starknet has 4 audit reports by 2 security firms on Trustblock; the latest is by Pashov Audit Group, dated 15 Aug 2025. Those reports list no open critical findings.
Record last updated . It holds audits and findings, contracts and incidents up to Nov 2026. Trustblock does not review code.
Audits4
Newest first
| Audit | Security firm | Date | Scope | Critical findings | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starknet security review | Security firm: Pashov Audit Group | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | No open critical findings | Open · GitHub |
| Starknet Nova security review | Security firm: Nethermind Security | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | 1 critical finding, fixed | Open · GitHub |
| Starknet Token Distributor security review | Security firm: Nethermind Security | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | No open critical findings | Open · GitHub |
| starkgate security review | Security firm: Nethermind Security | Date: | Scope: Files named in the report | No open critical findings | Open · IPFS |
Findings17
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Low | 0 | 4 | 6 |
Marked Best Practices or Info by the firms. Not counted as findings.
Best PracticesThe _assert_before_commit_start(...) has multiple responsibilitiesStarknet Nova security review · Nethermind Security · 10 Oct 2024Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportInfoHardcoded token addressStarknet Token Distributor security review · Nethermind Security · 22 Feb 2024Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportInfoLow trust on Alexandria Merkle Tree libraryStarknet Token Distributor security review · Nethermind Security · 22 Feb 2024Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportBest PracticesBasis points field bips in supernovatoken should be fixedStarknet Nova security review · Nethermind Security · 10 Oct 2024Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportBest PracticesReturn values from ERC20 transfer functions are not checkedStarknet Nova security review · Nethermind Security · 10 Oct 2024Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportInfoSale stage is not well defined at start and end timestampStarknet Nova security review · Nethermind Security · 10 Oct 2024Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportBest PracticesMaintainable imports rather single line for every importsStarknet Token Distributor security review · Nethermind Security · 22 Feb 2024Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportInfoPossible hash collision when calculating the hash of leavesStarknet Token Distributor security review · Nethermind Security · 22 Feb 2024Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportBest PracticesUnchecked return value for token transferStarknet Token Distributor security review · Nethermind Security · 22 Feb 2024Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportBest PracticesUse of Poisedon hashing instead of PedersenStarknet Token Distributor security review · Nethermind Security · 22 Feb 2024Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportContracts
No deployed address is recorded for these audits.
The reports name a repository or files. Open a report to see its scope.
Show this on your site
Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.
Content
Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.
Style
Format
<head><script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script></head><body><divdata-tb-project-widgetdata-tb-project-slug="starknet"></div></body>
Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.
Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us