Vfat Sickle
Ackee Blockchain Security reviewed vfat (Vfat Sickle) on 9 May 2025: 31 findings, 0 critical; 20 marked fixed, 7 acknowledged, 4 open.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen vfat’s security record
Report hosted on GitHub.
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from this report. Trustblock does not review code.
Findings31
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Low | 3 | 6 | 20 |
HighWhitelisted callers can perform delegatecall on every SickleNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
LowIncomplete data validation for NFT positionsNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
LowMissing duplicate registry validationNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
LowNo data validation on registry adding and updatesNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Part of vfat’s security record
vfatAudits2 audits by 1 firmLast audit Jun 2025, by Ackee Blockchain Security.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 2 reports.
Open vfat’s security recordSecurity firm
Ackee Blockchain Security39 projects reviewed · 81 reports · latest Jul 2026
See Ackee Blockchain Security’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us