Vfat Sickle

Ackee Blockchain Security9 May 2025Not recorded. See the report

Ackee Blockchain Security reviewed vfat (Vfat Sickle) on 9 May 2025: 31 findings, 0 critical; 20 marked fixed, 7 acknowledged, 4 open.

No open critical findings

Open the report Open vfat’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from this report. Trustblock does not review code.

Findings31

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

Severity	Open	Acknowledged	Fixed
Critical	0	0	0
High	1	0	0
Medium	0	1	0
Low	3	6	20

MediumReferral code setter can be front-runAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowAmbiguous handling of the native value in the SwapLib contractAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowDuplicate Sickle retrievalAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowDuplicate tokens in feeTokens array can lead to inconsistent fee calculationAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowInconsistent handling of ETH and WETH across the FeesLib contractAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing zero address validationAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowOne-step ownership transferAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of vfat’s security record

vfat

Audits2 audits by 1 firmLast audit Jun 2025, by Ackee Blockchain Security.

Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 2 reports.

Open vfat’s security record

Security firm

Ackee Blockchain Security

39 projects reviewed · 81 reports · latest Jul 2026

See Ackee Blockchain Security’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.