CertiK reviewed LiveArtX (LiveArtX-Ⅱ) on 20 Sep 2022: 13 findings, 0 critical; 2 marked fixed, 3 acknowledged, 8 open.
Report hosted on skynet.certik.com.
Trustblock does not review code.
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Low | 8 | 0 | 2 |
The order of external calls and transfers and storage variable updates should follow the check-effect-interaction pattern. ### External call(s) ```solidity=147 _transfer(beneficiary, msg.value); ``` * This function call executes the following external call(s). * In `MetaMorphic._transfer`, * `(success) = _address.call{value: _amount}()` ### State variables written after the call(s) ```solidity=151 mintedAmount1 = mintedAmount1.add(mintedAmount); ``` ```solidity=152 mintedAmounts1[account] = mintedAmount.add(amount); ``` --- ### External call(s) ```solidity=175 _transfer(beneficiary, msg.value); ``` * This function call executes the following external call(s). * In `MetaMorphic._transfer`, * `(success) = _address.call{value: _amount}()` ### State variables written after the call(s) ```solidity=179 mintedAmount2 = mintedAmount2.add(mintedAmount); ``` ```solidity=180 mintedAmounts2[account] = mintedAmount.add(amount); ```
In function `mint1()`, users can overpay for a given amount of tokens since the only check is the following: ```solidity if (msg.value < amount.mul(price1)) { revert InsufficientETH(); } ``` The same issue is present for function `mint2()`.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
1,044 projects reviewed · 1,375 reports · latest May 2025
See CertiK’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us