MetaPool

Resonance Security8 addresses on Ethereum and Solana

Audit · firm’s term: smart contract audit

Resonance Security reviewed Meta Pool (MetaPool) on 8 Aug 2025: 11 findings, 0 critical; 9 marked fixed, 2 open.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Meta Pool’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash QmeGnaTjX5NXYH7GHVLUfG6yKkKFMnA9EP4PTvfMjaLFqE

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings11

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High000
Medium000
Low209
LowMissing Usage Of NEAR SDK Integer Types For Input And OutputOpen

The function get_number_of_accounts() makes use of intput parameters of type u64. This type is longer than 52 bits and, as such, is not serializable by JSON, therefore making it impossible to retrieve a properly decoded value when calling this function through an external integrated interface.

LowUsage Of std Vec Not Gas EfficientOpen

The state variable staking_pools makes use of Vec as a collection from Rust's std library. This collection, as opposed to NEAR SDK's Vector collection, is not as efficient in term of gas usage when dealing with large amounts of data that do not need to be accessed altogether.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Meta Pool’s security record

Meta Pool
Audits2 audits by 2 firmsLast audit Aug 2025, by Resonance Security.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross the 2 reports, 2 critical findings were reported. Each is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.
Open Meta Pool’s security record

Security firm

Resonance Security

18 projects reviewed · 25 reports · latest Aug 2025

See Resonance Security’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us