Mugen security review
Pashov Audit Group reviewed Mugen (Mugen security review) on 19 Jan 2023: 7 findings, 0 critical; all marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Findings7
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Low | 0 | 0 | 4 |
HighAnyone can use or steal ArbitrumSwaps native asset balanceFixed
The report gives no description here.
HighMalicious user can easily make the protocol revert on every USDT swap on UniswapFixed
The report gives no description here.
MediumUse quoteLayerZeroFee instead of sending all native asset balance as gas fee for swap callFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowA require check can easily be bypassedFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowCheck array arguments have the same lengthFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowThe gasLeft() after gas-limited external call might not be enough to complete the transactionFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowUse an enum for the "step" types in ArbitrumSwapsFixed
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Part of Mugen’s security record
Mugen
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Jan 2023, by Pashov Audit Group.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Mugen’s security recordSecurity firm
Pashov Audit Group30 projects reviewed · 53 reports · latest Jul 2026
See Pashov Audit Group’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us