Mugen security review
Pashov Audit Group reviewed Mugen (Mugen security review) on 19 Jan 2023: 7 findings, 0 critical; all marked fixed.
Findings7
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Low | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Marked QA by the firm. Not counted as findings.
QAExternal method missing a NatSpecFixed
The report gives no description here.
QAMismatch between contract and file namesFixed
The report gives no description here.
QAMissing override keywordFixed
The report gives no description here.
QAMove code to bring cohesion upFixed
The report gives no description here.
QAPrefer battle-tested code over reimplementing common patternsFixed
The report gives no description here.
QARemove not needed custom errorFixed
The report gives no description here.
QASolidity safe pragma best practices are not usedFixed
The report gives no description here.
QATypos in commentsFixed
The report gives no description here.
QAUse x != 0 to get positive-only uint valuesFixed
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Part of Mugen’s security record
Security firm
Pashov Audit Group30 projects reviewed · 53 reports · latest Jul 2026
See Pashov Audit Group’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us