ZPZcoin / EZPZ - ZPZ Protocol Smart Contracts

CredShieldsCode version: not recorded (see the report)

CredShields reviewed ZPZcoin / EZPZ - ZPZ Protocol Smart Contracts on 5 Oct 2026: 30 findings, 1 critical; all marked fixed.

1 critical finding, fixed

Findings38

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical001
High005
Medium0013
Low0011

Marked Info by the firm. Not counted as findings.

InfoA third buyback inside ten minutes reverts on an immature checkpointFixed

The report gives no description here.

InfoBurns bypass the blacklist and the trading switchFixed

The report gives no description here.

InfopreviewUnstake contradicts every exit path it is meant to previewFixed

The report gives no description here.

InfoProposal finalisation depends on the proposer, and cancellation carries no time boundFixed

The report gives no description here.

InfoSkipped reward payments are not signalled, and APY accrues with no funding checkFixed

The report gives no description here.

InfoThe daily outflow basis is re-snapshotted every day, contradicting its documentationFixed

The report gives no description here.

InfoThe early-unstake penalty cited as the flash-stake mitigation does not existFixed

The report gives no description here.

InfoThe participation quorum counts opposing votes, so one wallet clears it aloneFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of ZPZcoin / EZPZ - ZPZ Protocol Smart Contracts’s security record

ZPZcoin / EZPZ - ZPZ Protocol Smart Contracts
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Oct 2026, by CredShields.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn that report, 1 critical finding was reported. It is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.
Open ZPZcoin / EZPZ - ZPZ Protocol Smart Contracts’s security record

Security firm

CredShields

45 projects reviewed · 58 reports · latest Oct 2026

See CredShields’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us